The Parable of the Unforgiving Servant
Jesus often used parables to give life lessons or
spiritual insight to his disciples. The
parable of the unforgiving servant is found in the book of Matthew in the New
Testament of the Bible. In Matthew
18:21-35, the lesson was initiated by Peter. Peter asked
Jesus how many times he is required to forgive someone who has wronged
him. Peter's suggestion was seven
times. Jesus replied that it was not
seven times, but seventy times seven.
What is significant about the number 7?
In the Old Testament
in the book of Genesis is when God brings the number 7 into his works. Genesis 1 describes the first
creation of the World by spending six days to create the Heavens and the Earth
but on the seventh day, they rested. This day was known to be the Sabbath Day,
which is the day known to keep it holy and rest as mention in Deuteronomy 5:12 . According to
scholars, the number 7 represents something as being completed, finished, or
done with. In order to completely forgive someone, Jesus uses the number 7
because it represents "completion." So, when Jesus wanted something
to represent completion, he would make reference to the number.
Did Jesus use the literary tool of hyperbole to create a stronger effect ?
Here is the
first exaggeration made in this parable.
It seems that Jesus was basically saying to forgive an unlimited amount
even though seventy times seven is an actual number: a person would not expect
to have to forgive someone that many times in actuality. This statement begins the parable lesson of
the unforgiving servant.
Considering that Jesus just used an exaggeration of
how many times to forgive, he begins his parable with an exaggerated amount of
money owed by the servant. The servant was brought before the king because he
owed him 10,000 talents. The chart below
gives an idea of exactly how large an exaggeration Jesus used. It would take 16 years to pay back 1
talent. This servant owed 10,000 talents
to a king. Whether a king would have
allowed a servant to accrue that much debt is not addressed in this parable, however
what is more clear is that the debt was more than the servant would ever be
able to repay.
How Does this teaching differ from the Old Testament Teaching
This teaching was different from the
Old Testament found in Exodus 21:24 According to Matthew 5:38-42.
They were not so forgiving in the Old Testament but sought restitution. Jesus
was bringing a new message of compassion and mercy. The Jewish laws was not
just laws found in the Old Testament but a system of rules that help establish
the operation of conflict to validate secular laws. What typically occurred
when someone owed a debt is that slavery was invoked. This was the option given to the unforgiving
servant until he pleaded with the king. There
is no evidence that this level of forgiving was common nor is it easy to
believe that a king would be so quickly turned by the pleading of a
debtor.
Metaphorical interpretation
Jesus seems to be giving an example
of how God, which is represented by the king, has the authority and compassion
to forgive beyond understanding just as the king did. Also just like the king, God can make a
judgment call in light of man's unwillingness to treat their fellow men in the
same manner. The debt owed by the servant can be the representation of
mankind's sin. Sin is a debt to God that cannot be repaid by mere human acts
and it can be man's sin against each other.